To really reuse code and to further unify the code lines, the directions must be matched. While doing this it could be also useful to adapt the naming scheme.
Currently, we have the following naming scheme with inconsistent order:
We need to agree on two points.
What order of directions should we follow?
Should we stick with the naming scheme or adapt it? Alternatives could be for example:
MPZ. (X = Minus, Y = Plus, Z = Zero)
ABC (X = (A) Minus, Y = (B) Plus, Z = (C) Zero)
Edited
Designs
Child items
...
Show closed items
Linked items
0
Link issues together to show that they're related.
Learn more.
If I were to classify the schemes, I would go for the original geographical notation then the MPZ then the ABC. I find the original geographical notation more intuitive and readable than both the MPZ and the ABC.
These examples of other codes show the problem of be consistend in the complete code. ;-)
a resume could be: If we want to be exclusive, we should use the ABC notation. If out code schould be readable for other groups, we should stick to the MP0 notation. :-)